xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Change to autoconf configuration of XFS

To: Ben Rockwood <benr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Change to autoconf configuration of XFS
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:51:25 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49432.209.157.70.17.1029801646.squirrel@www.cuddletech.dyndns.org>
References: <49432.209.157.70.17.1029801646.squirrel@www.cuddletech.dyndns.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:00:46PM -0700, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> 
> Hello.
> 
> I was hoping a change could be made to the "configure.in" files of XFS
> package.  Right now "configure" looks for each needed tool in a 
> staticlocation.  For most people this isn't an issue, but if you reinstall
> most of the GNU tools from source they install into /usr/local which
> isn't normally a problem.  Therefore, I'd ask that the AC_PATH_PROG lines
> have an expanded path.  You can either just add /usr/local/bin, or be
> even more forgiving and drop "$PATH" into the mix.  Here's an example
> of the modification for DMAPI configure.in line 123:
> 
> AC_PATH_PROG(LIBTOOL, libtool,,/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:$PATH)
> 
> If nothing else, this mod doesn't hurt anything and will keep users
> from complaining that they can't find libtool... "BUT I HAVE LIBTOOL!?!?!
> I'M NOT CRAZY!!!!".
> I can submit patches for the changes if you like.  Just let me know and
> I'll submit the patches to the list.

Sounds fair to me - if noone complains in a day or so, feel free
to send along patches.

thanks.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>