| To: | Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: logdev on IDE |
| From: | Charles Shannon Hendrix <csh@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:55:10 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <20020727172200.0d9e5c54.keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk> |
| Organization: | Big Endian |
| References: | <1027535026.1648.5.camel@stantz.corp.sgi.com> <20020727152441.GA9977@widomaker.com> <20020727172200.0d9e5c54.keith_m@sweeney.demon.co.uk> |
| Reply-to: | shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.4.1 |
On Saturday 27 July 2002 12:22 pm, Keith Matthews wrote: > I understand that this was through a hole in the ATA spec that was > closed about 6 months ago. I have no idea if there are any drives to > the old spec still in the supply chain, but those currently being > manufactured are probably OK. That's interesting. I had always heard it was pretty deliberate, and often driven by benchmarking tests. This is good if true, though I still don't really like IDE drives. -- UNIX/Perl/C/Pizza__________________________________shannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What Does "kernel mtrr" mean..., David Lloyd |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs-filesystem is broken after rsync (log-info), Dirk Munzinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: logdev on IDE, Keith Matthews |
| Next by Thread: | Re: logdev on IDE, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |