| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NFS |
| From: | Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Jul 2002 20:57:09 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207231138300.17152-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | League of Morgoth |
| References: | <20020723145840.GB2018@thangorodrim.thompson.us> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207231138300.17152-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | Skylar Thompson <skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Smtp-mailing-host: | smtp1.thompson.us |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:41:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Hi Skylar - > > NFS + Linux XFS is quite useable in general - we've chased down several > problems over the past few months. There are some outstanding issues, > but those generally show up under very high stress. OK. I'm not planning anything really big; I'll be storing about 40GB of data, and serving about 3GB of that over Samba and NFS. > The only real answer, of course, is to test it in your environment, > but I expect that it will work well for you. OK. I'll report back on the results once I finish the transition tonight. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - quota, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - Upgrade kbuild 2.5 rules for XFS and DMAPI, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NFS, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NFS, Skylar Thompson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |