| To: | Kelledin <kelledin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and grub-0.92 |
| From: | Bo Johansson <bjont97@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:25:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200207100743.g6A7hBiJ003200@Traveller.attbi.com> |
| References: | <200207100551.g6A5pX5G003057@Traveller.attbi.com> <20020710061931.GA18472@ids.org.au> <200207100743.g6A7hBiJ003200@Traveller.attbi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:43:11AM -0500, Kelledin wrote: > I just went through the XFS FAQ again and found something else...particularly > concerning LILO. It has the same problem as grub--it can't be installed on > the bootsector of a root partition, because it overwrites the XFS superblock. > This is apparently a limitation of XFS; only reason it worked with lilo is > because I had lilo's bootsector residing on floppy. If you want to have a separate bootsector you can install it on your swap-partition. I have been booting from swap for quite some time and it doesn't get overwritten. Regards Bosse -- Pussy: You spend 9 months trying to get out of it, and the rest of your life trying to get back in... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Integrating XFS with experimental NFS patches, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Integrating XFS with experimental NFS patches, Sean Gabriel Heacock |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and grub-0.92, Stephen Lord |
| Next by Thread: | kernel-headers, Jérôme Tournier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |