xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: plans for new release,update redate 2.4.18-5

To: Knut J Bjuland <knutjbj@xxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <ag@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: plans for new release,update redate 2.4.18-5
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:26:45 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207100806570.27023-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com>
References: <3D2BFC15.574702F8@online.no> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207100806570.27023-100000@stout.americas.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
hi,

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 08:13:41AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
> > ...
> >  Have you started to
> > feed linux with xfs patch in small bits?
> 
> Steve is in good contact with the kernel folks; in some sense this has
> already started (witness the EA/ACL code).  The bulk of XFS is not available
> in "little bits" though, and will just have to go in in a chunk.

Just to clarify - there is no ACL code in the kernel yet.  So far we
have EA VFS and system call changes in and also some quota changes.

ACL support shouldn't be too hard to get, I think; Andreas and I just
need to iterate a few more times on exactly what it is we should send.
The attached patch is my current "small is beautiful" version of VFS
POSIX ACL support and is everything we need from an XFS point of view,
but is not quite what Andreas wants, IIRC.  I'm a bit sidetracked on
capabilities code to follow up on this right now though.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

Attachment: posix_acl.patch2.5
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>