| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 May 2002 13:14:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux-xfs list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20020520123657.A19992@wotan.suse.de>; from ak@suse.de on Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:36:57PM +0200 |
| References: | <1021864059.2008.56.camel@musume.snl.home> <20020520123657.A19992@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:36:57PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > I don't think so. While it would be nice if XFS used more common > infrastructure or its infrastructure (pagebuf) would be more open to > other fs it is not an absolute requirement for merging. That's IMHO > based on merging of other file system and code, the last word has Linus > of course. Pagebuf is basically useable by other filesystems. For example I think I could port JFS to use it as backing for it's metapges - it just far too complex for JFS's needs so I don't see any point in doing so. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Strange behavior on the 2.4.18 XFS tree?, Michael Sinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS in the 2.5 kernel, Austin Gonyou |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |