xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

re[2]: XFS slows down on used partions with bonnie++

To: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: re[2]: XFS slows down on used partions with bonnie++
From: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:24:16 -0400
Cc: XFS mailing list <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: The NorcrossGroup
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
 >>  Plus, once you are on a raid device,
 >>  logical and physical closeness on the volume no longer mean very much.

Don't they?

I would have thought:

   Raid 0:         physical distance = logical distance / spindles
   Raid 1:         physical distance = logical distance
   Raid 1 + 0:   physical distance = logical distance / spindles / 2
   Raid 5:         physical distance = logical distance / (spindles - 1)
 
Certainly caches and elevator seeks can come into play, but it still seems 
worth considering the physical distance.

The only array I know of that would not work basically like the above is 
Compaq's really high-end EVA system.

I'm sure there are others, but I have to believe the vast majority of arrays 
use a very simple block layout.

Greg Freemyer
Internet Engineer
Deployment and Integration Specialist
Compaq ASE - Tru64
Compaq Master ASE - SAN Architect
The Norcross Group
www.NorcrossGroup.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>