xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs in linux

To: Knut J Bjuland <knutjbj@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs in linux
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:27:06 +0100
Cc: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C99C208.EFFCA9D8@online.no>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203210424000.16911-100000@burgers.bubbanfriends.org> <3C99C208.EFFCA9D8@online.no>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 12:20:40PM +0100, Knut J Bjuland` wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
> 
> > Care to give us a URL to visit?
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
> >
> > > Acording to openloggin xfs are going to be part of linux 2.5
> > >
> 
> http://www.bitmover.com:8888//tmp/v2_logging/athlon.transmeta.com/torvalds-20020205173056-16047-c1d11a41ed024864

This is not the Linus tree, but Chris Mason's (private) tree. 

Remember the bitkeeper license forces everybody to log all his private changes
to openlogging.org and in addition bitkeeper relates trees and mixes their
changelog.  It it is not surprising that the end result is rather confusing. 
You always have to be very careful that the change you're seeing is for
the right tree.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>