xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c

To: Alvaro Figueroa <fede2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Serveral weid errors on sys_sparc32.c
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:41:40 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1015547550.5642.10.camel@lucy>; from fede2@fuerzag.ulatina.ac.cr on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:32:30PM -0600
References: <1015543584.5649.2.camel@lucy> <20020308105627.G24252@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1015545746.5649.6.camel@lucy> <20020308111726.H24252@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <1015547550.5642.10.camel@lucy>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 06:32:30PM -0600, Alvaro Figueroa wrote:
> > > So this is a VFS quota bug?
> > 
> > It's an area which Jan's latest patches haven't addressed yet.
> > I'm sure he/someone will fix these issues at some point, we'll
> > just have to wait a bit (once they're fixed I'll merge them in
> > with the rest of the quota changes in CVS).
> 
> So, is there a quick work arround it? (I don't need any type of quotas,
> would there be a way to exclude code or something?) Or how could I
> download a CVS snapshot from _before_ this VFS quota code merge that is
> affecting me?

The 2.4.18 split patches will be fine (uses previous quota patches).
A CVS checkout from before 5th March will be OK too (I think you can
pass a date/time into cvs(1) when checking out).

Or you could just comment out the quota bit of code in the offending
file, if you don't need quotas at all.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>