| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_copy |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:43:40 +1100 |
| Cc: | Jason Joines <joines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1015543929.23850.22.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com>; from sandeen@sgi.com on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:32:09PM -0600 |
| References: | <200203071726.21801.joines@joines.okstate.edu> <1015543929.23850.22.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:32:09PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > It's not available for Linux - if I understand correctly, it uses Irix > threading that has no Linux counterpart. There are rumours of a library which provides the IRIX locking primitives (on top of pthreads I believe) having been done by the Performer guys, but I never saw any source & I'm not sure where to find it, if it exists. > We just ship the man page so you can see what you're missing, > apparently. ;-) No, not for a long time (once upon a time we did that) - the man page is in with the source now, and is not installed. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_copy, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Does XFS on hardware RAID5 have perfomance issues?, Adam McKenna |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_copy, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs_copy, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |