| To: | Jason White <jasonw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.18 update details |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:10:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15484.8798.263455.219288@jdc.local>; from jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au on Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:03:42AM +1100 |
| References: | <20020226114324.J193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <3C7AF03F.8384BF25@idcomm.com> <20020226132940.K193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <15483.9635.101270.256294@jdc.local> <20020226172010.M193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <15484.5757.823737.54107@jdc.local> <20020227102633.V193798@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20020226234658.GA2544@the-penguin.otak.com> <15484.8798.263455.219288@jdc.local> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:03:42AM +1100, Jason White wrote: > Now that ext3 and XFS use the same ACL interfaces, as I understand it, > the plan is to have a single set of ACL tools which will be compatible > with both filesystems. What this means on the packaging front is a > single set of packages that will support ext3 and XFS. > > I may be wrong here, but this is what appears to be underway (based on > mailing list discussion). correct. > Thus, once the common ACL tools are in place it would simply be a > matter of updating the relevant package files. yes, wont be long now. -- Nathan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.18 update details, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: oops umounting full LVM snapshots, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.18 update details, Jason White |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.18 update details, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |