| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | lvm and segmentation |
| From: | monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:45:25 +1000 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, I have been reading about lvm of late and was thinking of a possilbe drawback to its use. It strikes me that a filesystem no longer knows about a contiguoius disk the lvm and so if I define a preallocated 15Gb file then there is no real say, even if xfs_bmap reports a single extent, that I can be sure that there is a contiguious 15Gb block ready for my data. Just wondering if I am correct in this thought? -- ----------------------------------------------------- http://witme.sourceforge.net/libferris.web/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | bmv_oflags not being set, monkeyiq |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark, Timothy Shimmin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: lvm and segmentation, Sean Neakums |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |