xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs + rmap?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: xfs + rmap?
From: "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1013036086.8e4bd4@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:54:46 -0800
In-reply-to: <20020201225013.GH23997@flounder.net>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20020201215351.GF23997@flounder.net> <1012603950.25088.72.camel@UberGeek> <20020201225013.GH23997@flounder.net>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:50:13PM -0800, Adam McKenna wrote:
> issue 2 - vmscan.c - see http://flounder.net/vmscan.c.rej for the .rej file.

If I apply the patches in reverse order (i.e., apply rmap first then xfs), I
get the following .rej for vmscan.c:

***************
*** 391,397 ****
            continue;
        }

-       if (PageDirty(page) && is_page_cache_freeable(page) && page->mapping)
        {
            /*
             * It is not critical here to write it only if
             * the page is unmapped beause any direct writer
--- 391,397 ----
            continue;
        }

+       if ((PageDirty(page) || DelallocPage(page)) &&
is_page_cache_freeable(page) && page->mapping) {
            /*
             * It is not critical here to write it only if
             * the page is unmapped beause any direct writer


--Adam

-- 
Adam McKenna <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA
http://flounder.net/publickey.html |      38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>