xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to

Subject: Re: Reduce XFS footprint (was Re: TAKE - remove a function xfs added to filemap.c
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <rabe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:12:36 +0100
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:53:54 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:

[...]
>Another thing we could try is to make support for v1 dirs
>compile-time conditional (since noone/very few people will
>be using this), this might save a bit more space.  I think
>the code is all accessed via function pointers already, so
>the points of abstraction should be clearly defined.

I don't think that it's worth that you waste your time with this. I just 
thought 
I was using "wrong" options or something like that to compile XFS, or that 
there 
was a "plug'n'go" way of shrinking it. :-)


-- 
Verkaufe Original-BMW-Raeder:                    L I N U X       .~.
http://adsl-bergs.rz.rwth-aachen.de/~rabe       The  Choice      /V\
                                                 of a  GNU      /( )\
                                                Generation      ^^-^^



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>