xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent

from [Olaf Frączyk] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent
From: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:14:17 +0100
Cc: Olaf Frączyk <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3C44255B.8090008@sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 13:49:31 +0100
References: <20020110183051.A1483@venus.local.navi.pl> <1010688121.676.111.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20020115132520.C1593@venus.local.navi.pl> <3C44255B.8090008@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 2002.01.15 13:49:31 +0100 Stephen Lord wrote:
Please try this with the current cvs tree - there was a change in the last week which fixed
some problems with mmapped I/O under heavy memory pressure (the emacs build problem
mentioned on the list).

Which branch: 2.4 or 2.5?
I would prefer 2.4 if possible :)
Regards,

Olaf


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Stephen Lord
Next by Date:  Oops with 2.4.17 (CVS from today), Juri Haberland
Previous by Thread:  Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Stephen Lord
Next by Thread:  Re: problem with VMware -XFS guilty one - was: Re: XFS is innocent, Eric Sandeen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]