-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 00:49, Steve Lord wrote:
>
> I do not think that the presence of LVM in the kernel will have any
> effect on XFS, it is good to have a simpler test case though, there
> are some subtle interactions between XFS and LVM.
This is probabily unrelated & OT but just straight XFS on LVM seems OK in the
fact that I have not seen any problems with it as yet (but then again I have
not been looking for problems like file corruption) in any of my tests to
date.
There are however, may subtle (unhappy) interactions between XFS, LVM and
other kernel areas when you try to do snapshots for example.
- --
Adrian Head
(Public Key available on request.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8NHrh8ZJI8OvSkAcRAkp4AKCG0zoFe1k4Mg9QzkRMxhogT7J/UACeN3Yf
TRaK72ZvXelDk+x+CzjDVKI=
=lzJS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|