| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems |
| From: | "Adam McKenna" <adam-dated-1008108419.640eef@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:06:57 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <B835232B.9B6%gnydick@clubphoto.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10112062034020.8606-100000@xs4.xs4all.nl> <B835232B.9B6%gnydick@clubphoto.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.21i |
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:29:15PM -0800, Gabe E. Nydick wrote: > Seth, > > The system we have works fine with 1000 simultaneous bonnie++ processes > running under a PIII kernel. Do you think it could still be the memory? What is the IDE chipset? XFS is known to exacerbate problems with some chipsets due to its heavier disk use. --Adam |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | UW Math Dept/Institute for Scientific Computation, ccroswhite |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems, Gabe E. Nydick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux w/XFS on Athlon systems, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |