| To: | Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS ACL implementation. |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:30:31 +1100 |
| Cc: | "Quang Nguyen (Ngo)" <quang.nguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1007583963.3687.4.camel@UberGeek>; from austin@coremetrics.com on Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:26:03PM -0600 |
| References: | <ACD4093EB009D411BC8A009027D7699660A15D@mail.tapeware.com> <1007583963.3687.4.camel@UberGeek> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:26:03PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> I have a question on the ACL implementation in XFS, is it possible to
[ie. you have a question on POSIX ACLs]
> have "roles" setup so certain people can access certain filesystems,
> etc, regardless of the higher group perms?
If I understand what you're asking, then I think so, yes.
There's an example ACL usage scenario which I think maps
to what you mean by "roles" over here:
http://acl.bestbits.at/example.html
Hope this helps. The people on the acl-devel list will
likely be able to give you better insight into applying
ACLs in everyday use.
cheers.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Syscall number, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Follow up -- Re: Files on XFS not safe?!, Austin Gonyou |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS ACL implementation., Austin Gonyou |
| Next by Thread: | mmap() Limitation, Quang Nguyen (Ngo) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |