xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris.

from [Andrew Klaassen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris.
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:44:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <3BEA81FA.4020401@tampabay.rr.com>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011107140934.0323c578@pop.xs4all.nl> <3BEA81FA.4020401@tampabay.rr.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.23i 
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:00:42AM -0500,
Jesse W. Asher wrote:

> Isn't this kinda antithetical to the open source movement? 
> This is basically saying, "Hey, we're going to make something
> open source, just not on these platforms."

Sure, Solaris could use XFS.  They'd just have to GPL whatever
code they released it with.  :)

Andrew Klaassen
 - why don't you send them an email, ask them if they would do
it?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris., Derek Glidden
Next by Date:  Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris. -- Dual GPL/Commercial Licensing, Bryan-TheBS-Smith
Previous by Thread:  Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris., Derek Glidden
Next by Thread:  Re: XFS, Linux, and Solaris. -- Dual GPL/Commercial Licensing, Bryan-TheBS-Smith
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]