| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Total/Partial corruption |
| From: | Nick (Gunnar) Bluth <bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:22:41 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20011013232631.A32323@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110140409010.1797-100000@ctgw.lbsd.net> <20011013232631.A32323@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Am Sonntag, 14. Oktober 2001 05:26 schriebst Du: > comments on that setup? I'm still using kgcc. BTW, with RH 8.0 I believe > kgcc is history. (Double) Nope. It'll be 7.2, and I just compiled a kernel with kgcc. #> rpm -qf $(which kgcc) compat-egcs-6.2-1.1.2.16 (7.2 final) -- Nick (Gunnar) Bluth Muenster/Germany bluth@xxxxxxxxxxx RHCE/RHCX +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX. Ten years later they are choosing Windows over UNIX. What part of that message aren't you getting? - Tom Payne |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.5 or 2.6 rephrased, Federico Sevilla III |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.5 or 2.6 rephrased, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Total/Partial corruption, Nigel Kukard |
| Next by Thread: | Linux 2.5 or now 2.6 targeted, Alan Eldridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |