xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Oops on recovery with Linux-2.4.11-xfs on SPARC

To: Jim Crilly <noth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Oops on recovery with Linux-2.4.11-xfs on SPARC
From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:13:34 +0200
Cc: Sean Neakums <sneakums@xxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Message from Jim Crilly <noth@noth.is.eleet.ca> of "12 Oct 2001 02:45:45 EDT." <1002869146.796.3.camel@warblade>
References: <6ulmii5wxp.fsf@zork.zork.net> <200110111930.VAA25865@haddock.cd.chalmers.se> <1002869146.796.3.camel@warblade>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Also on sparc64 the kernel is 64-bit but the userspace is only 32-bit,
> so there's a conversion for anything passed from userspace to kernel via
> ioctls.

Actually, these days there is a 64-bit libc, so you can compile 64-bit
userland stuff (not that there are many 64-bit binaries around). However,
compiling them for 64-bit mode made no difference for xfs_repair,
it still died of SIGBUS in approximately the same place. I haven't
looked at any of the other userspace utilites yet (apart from mkfs).

/Anders

-- 
 -- Of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Anders Hammarquist                                  | iko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Physics student, Chalmers University of Technology, | Hem: +46 31 88 48 50
G|teborg, Sweden.           RADIO: SM6XMM and N2JGL | Mob: +46 707 27 86 87


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>