xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?
From: Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:46:30 +0300
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20011008090816.03ebe8c0@pop.xs4all.nl>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011008090816.03ebe8c0@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday 08 October 2001 10:08, Seth Mos wrote:
> At 08:53 8-10-2001 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I
> >used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version
> >or the kernel patch.
> >
> >(Forgive me if this is in the FAQ, I haven't found it.)
>
> Depends on the hardware. If you have a VIA based system better use the CVS
> version.
>
> Cheers

Hmm, may I have more information on that ? I have VIA system but I thought 
that the other subsystems of the kernel are taking care about dealing with 
it. I didn't know every FS implementation have to implement workarround for 
that...

-- 
Regards, Hristo.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>