| To: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] Re: XFS, Quotas and Samba |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:03:31 +1100 |
| Cc: | Bret Giddings <bret@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20010910100026.A2992@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>; from jack@suse.cz on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:00:26AM +0200 |
| References: | <7AC902A40BEDD411A3A800D0B7847B660882F5@sernt14.essex.ac.uk> <20010906105952.B345981@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20010906123515.A380241@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20010906163441.C24754@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20010909205752.A397355@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <20010910100026.A2992@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
hi Jan,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:00:26AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello,
> ...
> The patch seems to have one small problem: if version == 2 then
> size is set to D2.dqb_curspace but IMHO it should be something like
> toqb(D2.dqb_curspace).
>
There's a line in there before "curspace" is used which
converts from bytes to 1K blocks ("curspace >>= 10;"),
and we set blocksize to 1K for both VFS quota versions
... is that approach too simple? (do I need to do the
FIOQSIZE thing or something more complex like that?)
thanks.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: directory cache problems (I think), Simon Matter |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Updated quota RPM for RedHat 7.1, Simon Matter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] Re: XFS, Quotas and Samba, Jan Kara |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS, Quotas and Samba, Matthew Geier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |