xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Standard EA names

To: monkeyiq <monkeyiq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Standard EA names
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:27:23 +1100
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200109010420.f814KhY32589@monkeyiq.dnsalias.org>; from monkeyiq@users.sourceforge.net on Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 02:20:43PM +1000
References: <200109010420.f814KhY32589@monkeyiq.dnsalias.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
hi,

On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 02:20:43PM +1000, monkeyiq wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
>     I am creating a VFS solution that relies on EA to a heavy degree.
> I am wondering if there is a EA naming convention forum out there?

Not that I know of.  For the extended attributes that XFS uses
itself (ie. in the "root" namespace, not the "user" namespace),
the naming convention is to use "SGI_" as the name prefix.
This is used for things like ACLs, MAC labels, DMAPI attributes,
and several others.

>     For example, the GPG guys might decide what the attr name of a sig 
> block should be? I will probably make up names myself using something 
> like the emacs-naming-scheme that I have been using for read only 
> generated EA so far in ferris. Just thought I'd ask incase there was 
> already an effort in place for shared naming of handy attributes.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Standard EA names, Nathan Scott <=