xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfsrestore dumps core

To: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfsrestore dumps core
From: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:52:20 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3B84F978.A447BCA@ch.sauter-bc.com>; from simon.matter@ch.sauter-bc.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:39:20PM +0200
References: <3B84F978.A447BCA@ch.sauter-bc.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Simon,

On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 02:39:20PM +0200, Simon Matter wrote:
> 
> I was just trying to xfsdump and -restore some files on my test system
> and I get a core dump while restoring.
> The system is PII/400, 256MB, IDE disk, DLT1 tape drive /DELL PowerVault
> 110T). RH XFS 1.0.1 release, newest command rpms, including
> xfsdump-1.1.3-0.
> 
> BTW /dev/tape is a link to /dev/st0
> 
> I did the dump with:
> xfsdump -f /dev/tape -l 0 -s home -o -L session1 -M medium1 /
> 
> No problems so far, then is tried restore with:
> [root@looser /root]# xfsrestore -f /dev/tape xfsrestore
> xfsrestore: drive_scsitape.c:1492: do_next_mark: Assertion
> `rechdrp->first_mark_offset - rechdrp->file_offset <= ( off64_t )(
> contextp->dc_recsz )' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
Ok so this is the assertion bug (pv#831275 in SGI).

> I saw some discussion about this some weeks ago on this list but I was
> wondering it's not yet fixed or I'm doing something completly wrong ?
I haven't looked into this one yet.

Someone suggested a fix by not endian converting some value.
However, I wasn't convinced this was the right thing to do 
and so didn't check it in.

Ciao,
Tim.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>