| To: | Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and inodes (was: Recommendation on stable Reiserfs+NFS setup) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:06:42 +1000 |
| Cc: | Martin Apel <apel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108231520350.13881-100000@gusi.leathercollection.local>; from jijo@leathercollection.ph on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:32:17PM +0800 |
| References: | <Pine.SGI.4.20.0108230905450.222247-100000@tmsgi7.humanmodeling.tecmath.de> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108231520350.13881-100000@gusi.leathercollection.local> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
hi, On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:32:17PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > Martin, > (cc XFS Mailing List) > > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 at 09:11, Martin Apel wrote: > > There's one drawback using XFS instead of ReiserFS. You have to fix > > the number of available i-nodes at FS-creation time. A few times in No, I'm pretty sure you can increase this value while the filesystem is mounted - see the -m option to xfs_growfs. > > the past I had too few i-nodes on a filesystem which was otherwise > > still not full, so I had to copy all data somewhere else, reformat, > > and copy back. This is something I would like to avoid. I guess its too late now, but you almost certainly didn't need to do that. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS and inodes (was: Recommendation on stable Reiserfs+NFS setup), Seth Mos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | TAKE - quota tidyup, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS and inodes (was: Recommendation on stable Reiserfs+NFS setup), Federico Sevilla III |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and inodes (was: Recommendation on stable Reiserfs+NFS setup), Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |