| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: productionserver |
| From: | Thomas Kirk <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:48:41 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linux XFS Mailing List <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010823170101.033dd450@pop.xs4all.nl>; from knuffie@xs4all.nl on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:50PM +0200 |
| References: | <20010823164506.A9758@mmstreaming.dk> <4.3.2.7.2.20010823170101.033dd450@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:10:50PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: > XFS is nice for larger file sizes and also seems to do reasonably well when > using large databases. Our HW diskarray are gonna be aprox 500gb and we will run raid5 on top of that.Any considerations i should do if deploying XFS for the server? BTW i seem to get 2 copies of all the mails from this list? -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA thomas@xxxxxxxxxx Http://www.arkena.com "World domination. Fast" (By Linus Torvalds) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Root Aliases & Lock-ups on Mount w/ Initrd (was Re: initrd: couldn'tumount), Grant Erickson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: productionserver, Thomas Kirk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: productionserver, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: productionserver, Federico Sevilla III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |