| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: bdflush (was: corrupt inode) |
| From: | Keith Matthews <keith_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:25:04 +0100 (BST) |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010809163227.0333b8f8@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| References: | <3B7296F9.E1FAB9CA@fnal.gov>, <4.3.2.7.2.20010809163227.0333b8f8@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:43:34 +0200 Seth Mos <Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
> The journaling fs is not to blame, it does it's work correctly. The
> application needs to have some form of modern day filesystems. Does anybody
> have a ReiserFS or JFS filesystem to test this with?
I would say that JFS, ReiserFS and ext3 in metada-only mode will give
substantially the same result. Only ext3 in full journalling mode will differ.
--
Keith Matthews Spam trap - my real account at this
node is keith_m
Frequentous Consultants - Linux Services,
Oracle development & database administration
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: unable to open initial console, Jonathan Dill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3ware driver and XFS kernel from SGI (YAMTR), Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bdflush (was: corrupt inode), Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | OT: WMware beta, Alan Eldridge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |