| To: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logdev size? |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2001 11:43:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Andrew Klaassen <ak@dkp.com> of "Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:12:29 EDT." <20010726121229.A2656@dkp.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Shouldn't be. How big is the partition you're putting it on? > > A little over a terabyte. > > One more logdev optimization question: does it make a big > difference to overall filesystem performance whether the logdev > is on a fast disk or a slow disk? > > Andrew Klaassen I made a log bigger than this just now. The important thing about the log device is a good transaction rate - ops per second matters, data rate does not really. Steve (in a hurry) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: umask bug, Tad Dolphay |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump looking for libhandle.la in /lib, Andrew Klaassen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Andrew Klaassen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |