| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Logdev size? |
| From: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:12:29 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <3B603846.5B6A6980@sgi.com> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200107241352.f6ODqZJ23995@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010725205259.C2291@dkp.com> <3B603846.5B6A6980@sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Andrew Klaassen wrote: > > Hmmm. > > > > size 16384b specified for log subvolume is too large, maximum is 16032 > > blocks > > > > Is this a hard limit? > Shouldn't be. How big is the partition you're putting it on? A little over a terabyte. One more logdev optimization question: does it make a big difference to overall filesystem performance whether the logdev is on a fast disk or a slow disk? Andrew Klaassen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Logdev size?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Boot Failure after installing 1.0.1, Gonyou, Austin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Logdev size?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |