Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

[Rahul Jain <rahul@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> 
> 
> Seth Mos wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Xuan Baldauf wrote:
> > > Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> > > > For your Squid cache, don't go XFS, but instead go ReiserFS. It will do 
> > > > a great
> > > > job there. For your Samba or NFS partition, go XFS and not ReiserFS.
> > >
> > > I do not use XFS, currently. Why is XFS better for Samba?
> >
> > Because word documents average 0.1 - 1MB.
> 
> Ah. So you just mean speed (quantity), not some features (quality)-
> 

Actually, XFS supports full ACLs, which is a useful feature when serving up
samba shares, especially to NT/2k clients.