xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.6 patch does not apply cleanly to 2.4.6

To: "Steve Lord" <lord@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.6 patch does not apply cleanly to 2.4.6
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:22:45 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200107101610.f6AGAxu21955@jen.americas.sgi.com> from "Steve Lord" at "Jul 10, 2001 11:10:59 am"
Reply-to: ptb@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Steve Lord wrote:"
> The linux-xfs patches are pure kernel patches, the cvs ones contain other
> information. The FAQ is correct, and the README file contains a description
> of what the various patches are.

OK, thanks! Turns out I couldn't see the -cvs- part of the name
because my browser has chosen blue links on a black background.

The -cvs- bit reverses the alphabetic and numerical ordering, so
that linux-2.4.6-xfs-cvs-06212001.patch.gz is listed after
linux-2.4.6-xfs-07052001.patch.bz2, and the only bit in readable
white text is the "bzip2" file type at left in the listing, so I
wrongly got the impression that the patch was a bzip version
of the patch directly above it, which was a 2.4.5 patch.

If that makes sense ... (listing suppresed).

Peter

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>