| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and RAID5 |
| From: | Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:13:34 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <200106180555.FAA00389@groucho.maths.monash.edu.au>; from rjh@groucho.maths.monash.edu.au on Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:55:36PM +1000 |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010618070434.02d268e0@pop.xs4all.nl> <200106180555.FAA00389@groucho.maths.monash.edu.au> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2i |
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 03:55:36PM +1000, Robin Humble wrote: > Around the time of the 2.4.3 kernel we used XFS over software > RAID5 for a month or so before a disk died and we didn't > bother replacing it - we've been using 420G (7 disks) of RAID0 > since with zero problems. RAID5 seemed ok and we sorted out > any initial performance problems as we found them with the > super-responsive XFS people on this list. 7 disks? I'm curious: SCSI or IDE? (We're looking into a Promise or 3ware card to allow us to put lots of IDE drives in a box and run software RAID over top, and were wondering if anyone else has had experience with these cards+software RAID+XFS.) Andrew Klaassen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | CVSup question, Alan Eldridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS and RAID5, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and RAID5, Robin Humble |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and RAID5, Seth Mos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |