xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp

To: "Nathan J. Mehl" <memory@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Interest from the FreeBSD camp
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:43:57 +0200
Cc: "Jeffrey B. Layton" <jeffrey.b.layton@xxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010613113111.B8330@blank.org>; from memory@blank.org on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:31:11AM -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106111207380.5609-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> <3B24E5A1.7404BFBA@thebarn.com> <3B24E732.D3A3C8A6@sgi.com> <3B24EE05.F7E46B6C@thebarn.com> <20010613024149.Z8330@blank.org> <3B272FE8.97A8F575@lmco.com> <20010613113111.B8330@blank.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:31:11AM -0400, Nathan J. Mehl wrote:
> In the immortal words of Jeffrey B. Layton (jeffrey.b.layton@xxxxxxxx):
> > 
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Solaris use a Veritas
> > filesystem as the default filesystem (I know HP does).
> > If that is the case, then getting rid of royalities to Veritas
> > but still charging the same per license would increase
> > their profits. Sure sounds like motivation to me :)
> 
> Nope.  By default, Sun uses plain-ol-UFS.  (As of 2.8, they added
> metadata logging.)

Metadate-logging exists in SDS for about 5 years...

        Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>