| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... |
| From: | Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:44:32 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <8648.992061344@ocs4.ocs-net>; from kaos@melbourne.sgi.com on Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:35:44PM +1000 |
| References: | <20010608233837.A11062@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <8648.992061344@ocs4.ocs-net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:35:44PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: >On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 23:38:37 -0400, >Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>Knowing how heavily patched the RH kernels are (!!), does anyone know if >>there'd be impairment or malfunction running a stock + xfs kernel on a RH >>system? > >I know that Russell Cattelan did an XFS+kdb patch for Redhat 7.1. I >also know it took a *looong* time, fitting just the kdb patch into all >the RH bits and pieces from the -ac tree took me about 8 hours, and I >had all the tools to do the job. > >Russell, did that XFS for RH 7.1 patch get released? The patch I'm using is one he did last night. It's for RH Rawhide 2.4.5-0.2.9 kernel. It's on ftp.thebarn.com in /SGI/testing. -- Alan Eldridge "I've told you once." "No you haven't." |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Running kernel w/o RH patches ..., Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option, Russel Ingram |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Running kernel w/o RH patches ..., Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ..., Bryan J. Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |