xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS in kernel tree

To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS in kernel tree
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:32:48 -0500
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu> of "05 Jun 2001 12:10:04 CDT." <ufavgmargyb.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> "AW" == Arjen Wolfs <arjen@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> AW> I wouldn't expect something as invasive as a new filesystem to go in
> AW> until the kernel's core is stable (then again, i didn't expect 2.4.0
> AW> either until it was stable...who knows).
> 
> I believe a new filesystem went in in 2.4.5.  See fs/freevxfs.
> 
> The salient point is that adding this FS didn't require changes anywhere
> else in the kernel; it just added some files.  If XFS did the same, or if
> the non-localized parts could be fed in slowly until all of the
> infrastructure is in place, then it would probably be accepted without
> issue.
> 

This is in fact happening to a certain extent, 2.4.6-pre1 removes the need
for one particular change we had in the core kernel for example.

Steve


>  - J<



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>