| To: | Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site |
| From: | "Marcelo E. Magallon" <marcelo.magallon@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:25:55 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15127.19928.888633.844437@gilmour.mgm-net.de> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.18i |
>> Jochen Scharrlach <Jochen.Scharrlach@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > - are they bleeding-edge CVS code? It's taken off the CVS tree and diff'ed against a fresh 2.4.5 tree. It applies cleanly (just checked this to be sure). AFAICT (don't take my word for this, I use neither RH nor the SGI release) the "1.0" release is 2.4.2 + XFS at that time + "this really needs to be fixed" kind of patches. HTH, -- Marcelo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: problems compiling xfsdump, Timothy Shimmin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: does it work on 2.4.4, Marcelo E. Magallon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site, Jochen Scharrlach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New files on xfs ftp site, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |