| To: | dcox@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 May 2001 13:20:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | "T.Hattori" <tomo@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3B0E4163.CB410F31@mindspring.com>; from danscox@mindspring.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 07:26:27AM -0400 |
| References: | <3B0E11EC.30F45CF7@ppi.co.jp> <3B0E4163.CB410F31@mindspring.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 07:26:27AM -0400, Danny Cox wrote: > "T.Hattori" wrote: > > > > Hi. > > For maximam performance and efficient performance, EXT2 file systems can > > be built with "-b" & "-R stride= " options. > > For instance, to match a normal RAID controller's 64KB default stripe > > size, the command 'mke2fs -b 4096 -R stride=16 <device>' is > > appropriate. ( 4KB * 16 = 64KB) > > > > Can we tune XFS like this using -r option or others? > > Yes! In fact, mkfs.xfs "notices" if the block device is LVM or RAID, > and sets it's parameters automatically. FYI, they are: Are you sure it works for MD automatically too? When I'm reading the code correctly only LVM_BLK_MAJOR is checked for. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID, Danny Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID, Danny Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID, Danny Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mkfs.xfs option for RAID, Danny Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |