Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: Benchmarking ReiserFS, ext2, XFS

[Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>]

> >> reiserfs acls are so fast, its like they aren't even there ;-)
> > 
> > XFS ones will be fast too - if they fit in the inode, which can be
> > achieved if you know what you are doing (inode size is a mkfs option). 
> 
> Really, the reiserfs acls aren't even there.  Anyone doing benchmarks
> should think about the XFS features reiserfs doesn't have, turn some off
> (acls), and leave some on (delayed allocation, O_DIRECT).
> 
> -chris


See, shows how much I know about reiserfs and why I am not qualified to
to do real benchmarks on it ;-).

Steve