| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Bad blocks handling? |
| From: | Marten van Wezel <marten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 May 2001 15:29:20 +0200 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.0.1i |
Sir, Does XFS support Bad blocks handling? I am browsing the web for quite a while now but I can't find any reference to how XFS behaves under less then optimal hardware conditions? What happens when a block on a drive is physically bad, what happens when a scsicable is badly connected, etc etc? Are there provisions in XFS for this type of problems (mapping out bad blocks or perhaps even on-the-fly adjustments) or do we simply have to hope that the hardware itself is flawless? -Marten van Wezel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS performance issue solved, Walt H |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gcc / kgcc / egcs, Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Previous by Thread: | gcc / kgcc / egcs, Mário Gamito |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad blocks handling?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |