| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Losing partition table on Ultrasparc |
| From: | Martin Spott <mas@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:27:29 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010426184658.036ef430@pop.xs4all.nl>; from Seth Mos on Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:49:37PM +0200 |
| References: | <3AE8482D.A2497361@danet.de> <4.3.2.7.2.20010426184658.036ef430@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:49:37PM +0200, Seth Mos wrote: > A (uneducated) guess would be that it would have somthing to do with XFS > writing it's superblock on sector 0 of the partition? > Does the sun disklabel expect something here? Partition table and/or bootblock use to live within the first 64 kByte on Sparc systems (AFAIK), Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Losing partition table on Ultrasparc, utz lehmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Losing partition table on Ultrasparc, Martin Spott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Losing partition table on Ultrasparc, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Losing partition table on Ultrasparc, utz lehmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |