xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: mysterious dbench results

To: Thomas Graichen <thomas.graichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mysterious dbench results
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:33:50 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Message from Thomas Graichen <news-innominate.list.sgi.xfs@innominate.de> of "28 Feb 2001 15:29:43 GMT." <news2mail-97j5h7$ing$1@mate.bln.innominate.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I have been out for a while, or I would have posted something on this earli
> er.
> > The default mkfs options for xfs are not optimal for heavy I/O load, they a
> re
> > somewhat historical and should probably be changed.
> 
> > On mkfs try some options like this:
> 
> > mkfs -t xfs -f -l size=32768b /dev/xxx
> 
> just out of couriosity: would this work after fs creation time
> with the xfs_growfs -L option (which does not seem to work so
> far) - or only together with extending the size of the under-
> lying device?


Unfortunately, you can only extend the size of the log when the log is on
an external device. By default the log is in the middle of the filesystem,
and changing its size could well involve moving things out of the way, it
would certainly involve removing the newly used space from the available
free spare. All technically feasable, but not there in the code as it.

Steve



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>