| To: | Mark Hounschell <markh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH] |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Feb 2001 13:53:37 +0100 |
| Cc: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, hhp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3A8295DD.DC050118@compro.net>; from markh@compro.net on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:49:33AM -0500 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102071348290.11236-100000@snake-fist.gulag.glub.org> <3A823EB1.10E12173@thebarn.com> <3A8295DD.DC050118@compro.net> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:49:33AM -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote: > Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > > "Hong H. Pham" wrote: > > > > Thanks for the patch. > > I'll try to get this integrated in the next day or so. > > > This is good news.. > Will this fix also be put into the "patch" package anytime soon? Don't be so optimistic -- there was at least another long long related bug triggered in 2.95 by XFS. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Mark Hounschell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Mark Hounschell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GCC 2.95.x and stalled processes [PATCH], Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |