| To: | Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and test12 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2000 09:15:01 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3A3AD8E0.F5F73A4B@thebarn.com>; from cattelan@thebarn.com on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:52:16PM -0600 |
| References: | <3A3AD8E0.F5F73A4B@thebarn.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:52:16PM -0600, Russell Cattelan wrote:
> Short update:
> Test12 has proven more difficult than expected.
>
> I've working around the fact that ll_rw_block is redefining the b_end_io
> callback.
> I now have the file system reading AND writing data again.
You should use submit_bh() instead of ll_rw_block if you want to use
your own b_end_io.
Christoph
--
Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | XFS and test12, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS and test12, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS and test12, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS and test12, Russell Cattelan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |