| To: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS CVS development tree moving up to test8 |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2000 12:45:13 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200009282244.RAA10742@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from lord@sgi.com on Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:44:39PM -0500 |
| References: | <200009282244.RAA10742@jen.americas.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:44:39PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > Because we have some unofficial system calls in the tree for xfs and > there are other new system calls in test8 I would recommend a command > rebuild after this (make clean; make). This really only affects extended > attribute code, but these calls are in some of the command binaries, > and some of the test programs will fail if this is not done. Do you have plans to disable the system calls for the beta ? (or allocate official slots for them) -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RedHat 7.0 - unbootable, lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfs.o = 19M ?, Chmouel Boudjnah |
| Previous by Thread: | XFS CVS development tree moving up to test8, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS CVS development tree moving up to test8, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |