| To: | sgi.bugs.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG 802204 - lilo does not work on XFS |
| From: | "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Sep 2000 01:13:16 +0200 |
| Cc: | nb@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200009191816.LAA55724@info.engr.sgi.com>; from pv@relay.sgi.com on Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:16:27AM -0700 |
| References: | <200009191816.LAA55724@info.engr.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:16:27AM -0700, lord@xxxxxxx wrote: > The ioctl does appear to be returning reasonable results to user > space in that they increase as we move down the file in the normal > case. I have not confirmed that they are actually correct though. The most likely problem is that they're simply in the wrong unit, the arithmetic in the macros linvfs_bmap uses to convert looks suspicious. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ADD 802017 - ASSERT fail in xlog_get_bp on small mem machine, dxm@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ADD 802204 - lilo does not work on XFS, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | BUG 802204 - lilo does not work on XFS, lord@xxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | ADD 802204 - lilo does not work on XFS, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |