xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: GRUB doesn't handle large linux kernels

To: proski@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GRUB doesn't handle large linux kernels
From: OKUJI Yoshinori <okuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:27:01 +0900
Cc: zchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bug-grub@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006261026280.4650-100000@sunapee.transcept.com>
References: <20000626211927T.okuji@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006261026280.4650-100000@sunapee.transcept.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
  Hi Pavel,

From: Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: GRUB doesn't handle large linux kernels
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:09:28 -0400 (EDT)

> The choice between self-loading "vmlinuz" and multiboot-compliant
> "vmlinux" can be different for different users.

  I see, but vmlinux is not Multiboot-compliant anyway (yet). IMO,
GRUB shouldn't support proprietary kernel formats any more, because
that is far from the original goal for which Erich Boleyn headed.

> I remember me seeing a patch doing exactly that. Try search engines. The
> patch may be obsolete.

  I found it. :)

http://ftp.inf.tu-dresden.de/operating_systems/mach/mach4/multiboot/linux-patch

> The Linux way is also sharing the code and staying away from bloat. But
> it's not me to decide, as I almost don't use Linux on i386 systems now.

  I don't, either. I myself use sparc64-linux-gnu mainly these
days. ;)

Okuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>