This is starting to smell like soup. Good job!
Thanks,
Jim
>
>
>Following are results of running "bonnie" using a file size of 256M.
>Tests run on a 2-cpu system with 64M memory. Measurements taken
>for 3 runs each using ext2 and xfs. For the most part, results of the
>tests are virtually identical in using ext2 and xfs, except for:
>
>1. sequential character input is slower in xfs by about 7-8%
>2. Block write performance is slower in xfs by about 1-2%
>3. XFS seems to use a little bit more cpu for block operations & rewrite.
>
>
> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
>Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
>EXT2 256 3626 99.9 7615 12.0 2932 6.1 3005 89.8 18495 22.7 176.7
>3.3
>EXT2 256 3632 100.0 7670 12.6 2920 5.9 2998 90.1 18483 22.4 179.6
>3.3
>EXT2 256 3631 100.0 7679 12.4 2931 6.3 3011 89.7 18478 24.0 187.0
>4.2
>
>XFS 256 3633 100.0 7599 12.7 2906 7.4 2782 83.8 18480 27.4 181.7
>4.3
>XFS 256 3624 99.6 7614 13.8 2968 7.6 2776 83.6 18563 25.7 185.3
>3.6
>XFS 256 3625 99.7 7539 13.0 3014 7.9 2818 84.8 18557 29.4 183.4
>4.9
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Rajagopal Ananthanarayanan ("ananth")
>Member Technical Staff, SGI.
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
|