| To: | Jim Mostek <mostek@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 64 bit status report |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Apr 2000 10:35:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phil Schwan), linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2000 09:20:52 CDT |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > My initial thought is lets get all ino_t's in linux to move to 64 bit. > This will take time, but we should do it since file systems will get this > big. > > For XFS, this isn't a problem 'till we hit file systems around 4Tbs or so. > But, it does become a problem. > It is 2Tbytes where this will fall over, and it is not the only thing, block numbers are passed around in 4 bytes signed values. At 512 byte block size this also falls over at 2 Tbytes. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Italian socks, calze |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 64 bit status report, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 64 bit status report, Russell Cattelan |
| Next by Thread: | Italian socks, calze |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |