On Thu, Mar 30 2000, lord@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > Looks like it tried to grab a spin lock in use and got caught by
> > the nmi watchdog.
>
> Hmm, this one could be fun - I suspect we have one thread using a buffer
Indeed.
> while another one is attempting to free it.... I have definitely seen
> problems in this area. CONFIG_PAGE_BUF_META is going to be a fairly
> delicate area for a while, we have implemented a totally new buffering
> system underneath XFS - and it does not have exactly the same behavior
> as the original irix one.
Okay, this brings me to another point - what is your preferred bug
report style? kdb or ksymoops? Should the PAGE_BUF_META options
be enabled? Etc.
> > xfs_iomap_write returning ERROR 28
> > write, delalloc. add some code here
>
> Congratulations! I think you are the first person to fill a disk on XFS on
> Linux. The delalloc one is a bit wierd, but could be explained by the lack
> of any check in the new I/O code for ENOSPC.
It was a small 1.3GB partition :)
--
* Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
* Linux CD/DVD-ROM, SuSE Labs
* http://kernel.dk
|